Download free mac os x. How do I mount --bind inside a Docker container? 1 answer My container images is derived from ubuntu 16.10 When container starts, it downloads an Android rom.zip image, then extract from it new system.new.dat and convert into an.img file (so it's now containing and ext4 partition). The latest DSM version defaults to formatting volumns with BTRFS, while I know there are advantages to this file system, do you really gain anything over just going with ext4? It from what I've read seems like a relatively new file system. I'm not really a linux person so I don't have the largest knowledge on the two file systems. Is it better to just stick with ext4 for now? It seems like btrfs uses more disk space up since it versions (i assume ext4 doesn't from the light reading i've done on the two?). Btrfs has issues and isn't to be depended on for long-term storage, whereas ext4 was made for it. Since you've pretty much answered your own question by the statement 'btrfs uses more disk space', yeah. Ext4 is the clear choice of the two. Well all I knew about BTRFS was the journaling part and that take, and that synology pushes it as the default file format now. I put a new volumn on and it went right to btrfs. Probably should redo that as Ext4, which is what I've been using for the other volumns. 'Btrfs has issues and isn't to be depended on for long-term storage' Where did you read this?? Why would it not be good for long term storage??? To be honest for a storage system btrfs would be hands down the most logical choice period!! Too many reports of btrfs flaking out and destroying the data stored within the file system. The guy that does the Linux Action Show had a run-in with it about a year ago, iirc, and was quite vocal about how badly it treated him after a mere weekend of use. [EDIT] Here's the whole incident. So 1 idiot on youtube?? Without even 5k views? Over a year ago. So that was posted Apr 2015, so that was what version at best 3.19.1? So we are now version 4.7.2, think maybe a few improvements? So synology has now made it their default?? Do you think that would be a wise choice for a company that makes nas's for their bread and butter if their was even a slight chance it could flake out and wipe all their users data?? Does that sound plausible?? Mindovermatter was their red flashing lights, bells going off warning warning warning you could loose data using this?? So 1 idiot on youtube?? Without even 5k views? ![]() Over a year ago. So that was posted Apr 2015, so that was what version at best 3.19.1? So we are now version 4.7.2, think maybe a few improvements? So synology has now made it their default?? Do you think that would be a wise choice for a company that makes nas's for their bread and butter if their was even a slight chance it could flake out and wipe all their users data?? Does that sound plausible??
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |